Camera Tests


I just purchased an Olympus E-PL1 and am doing some comparison tests with my older Canon SX10 IS. Probably not of interest to anyone but me. The flower shots are hand-held, the bits and pieces shots are tripod.

Image RollSeq.CanonSX10IS-200ASA-Full.html, size 676231 b
Image RollSeq.CanonSX10IS-80ASA-Full.html, size 648445 b
Image RollSeq.OlympusEPL1-200ASA-Full.html, size 613648 b
Image RollSeq.CanonSX10IS-200ASA-Crop.html, size 497137 b
Image RollSeq.CanonSX10IS-80ASA-Crop.html, size 502677 b
Image RollSeq.OlympusEPL1-200ASA-Crop.html, size 299671 b
Image RollSeq.CanonSX10IS-ISO80-400-1600-full.html, size 420952 b
Image RollSeq.Colour-Onatural-Canon-Omuted-Oiauto.html, size 353440 b
Image RollSeq.OlympusEPL1-ISO100-1600-3200-full.html, size 422473 b

For the record, I deal in JPGs. Of course RAW would be better and probably would have changed my views on the two cameras: the Olympus does RAW by changing a setting while the Canon will only do it if you install CHDK (not something I've done, nor am I likely to). But between the way RAWs gobbles storage and backup space and the poor handling of RAW on Linux, I'm sticking with JPG for now.

After staring at these images for a long time, only a couple things are clear: the default colours on the Olympus (their "Natural" setting in camera) are too vivid, and the Olympus is definitely superior at high ISOs. What's surprisingly unclear is which produces better images at low ISOs: the Olympus is 12MP as opposed to the Canon's 10MP, but I think the Canon images are actually marginally better even not considering the colours. And to switch to the Olympus, I would lose:

What I would gain with the Olympus:

Post Script: Best Buy was kind enough to take the Olympus back. Which is good, because the Canon is immensely superior for 99% of the things I do. (4.4Kb)
Last modified 20110906 by giles